Legal Acts Can’t Be Evidence In Arminak Suit: Judge

Law360, New York (June 13, 2011, 3:02 PM EDT) -- A California federal judge on June 7 refused to let Arminak & Associates Inc. argue in its long-running antitrust suit against Mead Westvaco Calmar Inc. that lawful actions taken by Calmar were part of a plot to monopolize the trigger sprayers market.

Allowing the household products packaging company to submit that type of evidence against Calmar would chill competition and "undermine the very purpose of the antitrust laws," U.S. District Judge Cormac J. Carney said in the order.

"The antitrust laws exist to promote competition, including...
To view the full article, register now.




Case Information

Case Title

Arminak and Associates Inc v. Saint-Gobain Calmar Inc

Case Number



California Central

Nature of Suit



Cormac J. Carney

Date Filed

November 16, 2004

Law Firms

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.