Legal Acts Can’t Be Evidence In Arminak Suit: Judge

Law360, New York (June 13, 2011, 3:02 PM EDT) -- A California federal judge on June 7 refused to let Arminak & Associates Inc. argue in its long-running antitrust suit against Mead Westvaco Calmar Inc. that lawful actions taken by Calmar were part of a plot to monopolize the trigger sprayers market.

Allowing the household products packaging company to submit that type of evidence against Calmar would chill competition and "undermine the very purpose of the antitrust laws," U.S. District Judge Cormac J. Carney said in the order.

"The antitrust laws exist to promote competition, including...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Arminak and Associates Inc v. Saint-Gobain Calmar Inc


Case Number

8:04-cv-01455

Court

California Central

Nature of Suit

Patent

Judge

Cormac J. Carney

Date Filed

November 16, 2004

Law Firms

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.