Law360, New York ( August 22, 2011, 12:31 PM EDT) -- The California Supreme Court's decision in Henkel Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 29 Cal. 4th 934 (2003), was a major moment in the ongoing saga of the enforceability of "anti-assignment" clauses in liability insurance policies. Henkel's pro-insurer result — invalidating unconsented-to assignments of insurance rights granted prior to the time the coverage claim is "reduced to a sum of money" owed under the policy — surprised litigators and deal lawyers alike, and drew national attention....
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.
A Law360 subscription includes features such as
- Daily newsletters
- Expert analysis
- Mobile app
- Advanced search
- Judge information
- Real-time alerts
- 450K+ searchable archived articles
And more!
Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.