6th Circ. Says Job, Not $4.4M, Is Proper Award For Vet

Law360, New York (December 14, 2011, 4:05 PM EST) -- The Sixth Circuit on Wednesday refused to restore the $4.4 million jury verdict awarded to a veteran who had sued the Army for creating a work environment so hostile he was forced to quit, finding the lower court had not erred in favoring job reinstatement.

The appeals court, in a unanimous decision, partially affirmed a Michigan federal court’s conclusion that reinstatement of plaintiff James McKelvey's job, rather than the $4.4 million a jury awarded in front pay, was an appropriate remedy in the case.

The panel...
To view the full article, register now.

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.