Law360, New York (January 3, 2012, 9:45 PM EST) -- Since it was adopted in California in 1978, courts have grappled with how to apply the consumer expectations test in product liability cases. Originally designed to ease the plaintiff's burden in proving a product defect, the test does away with expert testimony and simply asks whether a reasonable consumer would believe the product failed to perform as safely as expected.
The greatest limitation of the test has always been that most consumers do not have an understanding of the sometimes complicated design decisions that go into many products, and thus, likely do not have a basis to form safety expectations regarding...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!