Reasonable Royalty: Analytic Vs. Hypothetical Approach
February 21, 2012, 1:46 PM EST
Law360, New York (February 21, 2012, 1:46 PM EST) -- One of the more difficult legal questions presented in patent infringement actions is how best to determine a “reasonable royalty” under 35 U.S.C. § 284. Currently, the primary standard for determining a “reasonable royalty” is the “hypothetical negotiation” approach that arises from Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. U.S. Plywood Corp., 318 F. Supp. 1116 (S.D.N.Y. 1970), modified, 446 F.2d 295 (2d Cir. 1971).
Under this standard, the trier of fact "envision[s] the terms of a licensing agreement reached as the result of a supposed meeting between the patentee...
Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.