We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

Ruling Nixes Broad "No-Hire Provisions"

Law360 (August 3, 2007, 12:00 AM EDT) -- A California appellate court held in a recent decision that a broad “no-hire” provision contained in a consulting agreement was unenforceable as a matter of law because it was an impermissible restraint on trade in violation of California Business and Professions Code Section 16600.

This decision impacts employers because some businesses include “no-hire” or “non-solicitation” provisions in their business service agreements and employment agreements.

Businesses, typically consultants or temporary agencies, frequently use “no-hire” provisions to protect their investment in their employees by preventing their clients from...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.