Case Study: Minn-Chem V. Agrium

Law360, New York (August 7, 2012, 1:34 PM EDT) -- An en banc panel of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held in Minn-Chem Inc. et al., v. Agrium Inc., et al. that the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act[1] relates to the merits of an antitrust claim, rather than to the subject-matter jurisdiction of a court.[2] The court's decision, which overrules a 2003 decision by the same court, removes a jurisdictional barrier to plaintiffs challenging foreign conduct in U.S. courts, and clarifies the scope of the FTAIA. 

This decision eases the burden on plaintiffs alleging that foreign conduct violates U.S. law and can be challenged in U.S. courts, and will likely...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!