Supreme Court Told Calif. Law Preempted By CAN-SPAM

Law360, New York (August 24, 2012, 5:06 PM EDT) -- An email marketing company asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday to hear its appeal of a state appeals court decision that the company violated California's anti-spamming law, arguing that the statute is preempted by federal law.

Trancos Inc. filed petition for writ of certiorari claiming a California appeals court made a mistake when it upheld a trial court ruling ordering Trancos to pay attorney Daniel Balsam $7,000 in liquidated damages and $81,900 in attorney's fees for sending him seven unsolicited emails. Because the messages were...
To view the full article, register now.

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.