UBS Mea Culpa May Give Libor Antitrust Plaintiffs Upper Hand
By Max Stendahl (December 19, 2012, 6:28 PM EST) -- By admitting to fixing the London Interbank Offered Rate on Wednesday as part of a $1.5 billion settlement, UBS AG might have backed itself into a corner in civil antitrust litigation and handed plaintiffs a trump card that could force the bank to cough up another hefty sum.
UBS agreed to pay the $1.5 billion fine to settle claims its traders routinely encouraged bank employees to make false submissions to a Libor rate-setting group, thereby helping UBS' trading positions. Most of the rate-rigging involved yen-denominated Libor, prosecutors said, prompting a rare guilty plea Wednesday by UBS' Japanese subsidiary along with criminal...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!