Business Judgment Rules The Roost In Exec Pay Analysis

Law360, New York (April 5, 2013, 10:43 AM EDT) -- The Delaware Supreme Court recently upheld a Delaware Chancery Court ruling holding that a company’s board of directors did not commit corporate waste in implementing a bonus plan under which payments to executives would not be tax deductible to the company under Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) (Section 162(m)).[1]

In its Jan. 14, 2013, decision in Freedman v. Adams, the court focused on the board’s exercise of its business judgment in affirmatively choosing not to adopt a more tax efficient Section 162(m)-compliant bonus plan in order to retain flexibility in its structuring of incentive compensation arrangements. This ruling affirms both the...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!