Nested Functional Language: Intended Use Or Limitation?

Law360, New York (May 7, 2013, 12:21 PM EDT) -- On Feb. 15, 2013, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit released In re Jasinski, a nonprecedential opinion[1] overturning a Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences ("BPAI") ruling. The BPAI had issued a decision upholding a rejection of a method claim based on an anticipatory reference by reasoning that functional language used in the method claim was not a limitation.[2] The functional language was cited in the body of the claim and nested within another functional phrase as follows: "comparing said fail memory locations derived by said logical-to-physical mapping software to said various predetermined memory locations to verify the accuracy...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!