Nested Functional Language: Intended Use Or Limitation?
Law360, New York (May 7, 2013, 12:21 PM EDT) -- On Feb. 15, 2013, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit released In re Jasinski, a nonprecedential opinion overturning a Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences ("BPAI") ruling. The BPAI had issued a decision upholding a rejection of a method claim based on an anticipatory reference by reasoning that functional language used in the method claim was not a limitation. The functional language was cited in the body of the claim and nested within another functional phrase as follows: "comparing said fail memory locations derived by said logical-to-physical mapping software to said various predetermined memory locations to verify the accuracy of said logical-to-physical mapping software." The BPAI deemed the functional language "to verify the accuracy of said logical-to-physical mapping software" to be merely a statement of intended use....
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.