Law360 (January 25, 2008, 12:00 AM EST) -- Not a fan of the term “patent troll,” Rambus Inc. has prevented its rivals from using the expression as the case alleging Rambus improperly amended and aggressively enforced its dynamic random access memory chip patents heads to trial Tuesday.
Judge Ronald M. Whyte on Friday prohibited parties from using “patent troll” and limited references to “submarine patent” — terms that cast a negative light on patent-holding companies that target industries by using patent litigation in order to win settlements — during the course of the trial in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Plaintiffs Hynix Semiconductor Inc.,...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!