Koontz Dramatically Alters Land Use Regulatory Landscape

Law360, New York (July 11, 2013, 11:28 AM EDT) -- Recently, amid a flurry of landmark decisions concerning affirmative action, the Voting Rights Act, DOMA and Prop 8, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision that received significantly less fanfare but may drastically affect a wide range of land-use regulations. In a 5-4 decision, the court held in Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District that the government can be held liable for an improper taking when it denies a land-use permit on the basis that the applicant did not accede to a condition to dedicate money, services, labor, or any other type of personal property to a public use....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!