How Calif. Wrongly Decided Ceres V. Stanislaus County

Law360, New York (August 13, 2013, 3:45 PM EDT) -- On July 8, 2013, the Fifth District of the California Court of Appeal issued Citizens for Ceres v. Super. Ct. of Stanislaus County (Case No. F065690 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th, July 8, 2013)) a perplexing opinion holding that pre-project approval communications between the agency conducting California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review and the project applicant are not protected by the attorney-client privilege.

Ceres disagrees with California Oak Foundation v. County of Tehama, 174 Cal.App.4th 1217 (2009), an important 2009 Third District decision that held that communications...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.