High Court Asked To Define 'Participant' Of ERISA Benefit Plan

Law360, Los Angeles (October 4, 2013, 4:57 PM EDT) -- A former ConocoPhillips Co. manager has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to define a "participant" in a benefit plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, arguing a lower court improperly refused to remand his state breach-of-contract claims against ConocoPhillips even though he wasn't a participant in an ERISA-covered company benefit plan.

In a petition for certiorari dated Oct. 1, John D. Clayton contended the Fifth Circuit erred in upholding a Texas federal court's ruling denying his motion to remand the suit to state court. Federal...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.