Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Expert Analysis

Post-Actavis, Pay-For-Delay Debate Is Far From Over

Law360, New York (December 18, 2013, 10:38 PM EST) -- In June, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its highly anticipated opinion in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis Inc.[1] In Actavis, the court weighed in on a legal and economic dispute that had been brewing in the lower courts for over a decade — how to assess the legality of so-called "reverse-payment" or "pay-for-delay" patent settlements. Although the opinion resolves some of the issues animating that debate it also leaves much unresolved, and it seems likely that years of litigation remain before we know how the legal landscape will develop in light of Actavis....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Related Sections

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!