Philly Law Firm Gets Antitrust Claims Cut From Bus Ad Suit

Law360, New York (December 16, 2013, 2:06 PM EST) -- A Pennsylvania federal judge on Friday trimmed claims from a suit that a Philadelphia-area law firm filed against a competitor over its exclusive agreements to advertise on certain transit agencies' buses, dismissing allegations that Lundy Law LLP's ad contracts were anti-competitive but preserving a false advertising claim against the firm.

U.S. District Judge Cynthia Rufe threw out seven of nine counts in a lawsuit from rival firm Larry Pitt & Associates PC, including federal antitrust claims, ruling there was no proof that Lundy's exclusive deals with...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

LARRY PITT & ASSOCIATES v. LUNDY LAW, LLP et al


Case Number

2:13-cv-02398

Court

Pennsylvania Eastern

Nature of Suit

Other Statutes: Anti-Trust

Judge

CYNTHIA M. RUFE

Date Filed

May 2, 2013

Law Firms

Companies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.