It's Not The End Of The Piece Rate Pay System In Calif.

Law360, New York (February 11, 2014, 4:40 PM EST) -- Recent decisions in California (Gonzalez v. Downtown LA Motors and Bluford v. Safeway Stores Inc. along with Armenta v. Osmose Inc.) requiring that employers pay employees the minimum wage for each increment of work time, including nonproductive time and rest breaks, have significantly impacted employers' pay policies. These decisions are thought to have made it more difficult, if not impossible, for employers to maintain the piece rate pay system. This system, in principle, pays employees based on productive time, which is not necessarily all hours worked. The most popular advice from employment attorneys to employers is to convert their piece rate...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Related Sections


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!