Calif. Court Reverses Preemption Of Medtronic Injury Suit

By Andrew Scurria (January 28, 2014, 3:35 PM EST) -- A California appeals court on Monday flipped a decision that found a Medtronic Inc. bone fusion product recipient's personal injury suit to be preempted, ruling that the company's twin duties to disclose adverse outcomes under state and federal law do not conflict.

A unanimous panel of the intermediate Court of Appeal revived plaintiff John Coleman's negligence and strict liability failure to warn claims, finding that California tort law's requirement that Medtronic file adverse event reports with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration paralleled the company's responsibilities under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act to do the same.

The court adopted...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!