9th Circ. Weakens Arbitration Clauses Post-Concepcion

Law360, New York (February 7, 2014, 4:09 PM EST) -- The Ninth Circuit continues to chip away at the enforceability of arbitration agreements as agreed upon by parties. Since the advent of the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark decision, AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740 (2011), which boldly affirmed the supremacy of the Federal Arbitration Act over state laws restricting arbitration agreements, California state courts, as well as the Ninth Circuit, regularly issue decisions diminishing parties' freedom to shape arbitration agreements as they see fit. The Ninth Circuit's recent ruling in In re Wal-Mart Wage and Hour Employment Practices Litigation, 737 F.3d 1262 (9th Cir. 2013) is no different....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Related Sections

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!