Merle Norman Retaliation Plaintiff Owed Benefits, Court Says

By Jeff Sistrunk (February 12, 2014, 7:07 PM EST) -- A California appeals court on Monday ruled that Merle Norman Cosmetics Inc. must pay unemployment benefits to a former employee who claims she was fired in retaliation for reporting alleged sexual harassment, finding that the employee did not technically quit her job by making requests about work conditions that the company found unreasonable....

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Attached Documents

Related Sections

Law Firms


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!