N.J. Justices Narrow Use Of Damages As Deterrent

Law360, New York (March 28, 2008, 12:00 AM EDT) -- Punitive damages should be used to deter and punish the wrongdoer in a specific case and not as a general deterrent against the misconduct of others, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled Thursday, overturning a jury award in a sexual harassment case.

A New Jersey superior court overstepped the mark in holding that general deterrence could be considered during deliberations by a jury that awarded $85,000 in punitive damages against Mack Auto Mall Inc., the supreme court said.

The justices did rule, however, that in assessing...
To view the full article, register now.

Law360 UK

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Legal News & Analysis

Financial Services Law360 UK and Insurance Law360 UK provide breaking news and in-depth analysis on U.K. and European Union regulation, enforcement, legislation, and litigation involving banks, investment firms, insurers, and more.