Baker Botts $41M Verdict Puts Patent Conflicts In Crosshairs

By Jess Krochtengel (May 15, 2014, 9:53 PM EDT) -- Baker Botts may have avoided paying damages on a $41 million patent malpractice verdict Thursday, but a Texas jury's liability finding highlights the difficulty firms face in flagging potential conflicts in patent prosecution work and is likely to spur similar malpractice suits against other large firms, attorneys say.

The jury found Baker Botts was negligent in not disclosing to former client Axcess International Inc. that the firm also represented Axcess' chief rival, and said the negligence cost Axcess $40.53 million in damages — a figure based on royalties Axcess argued it would have earned through broader patent rights had Baker Botts...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!