High Court Finds ERISA Conflict Standards Unclear

Law360, New York (April 23, 2008, 12:00 AM EDT) -- U.S. Supreme Court justices grilled attorneys but received few concrete answers during oral arguments on Wednesday over how much weight an insurance company's conflicts of interest should play in reversing a benefit plan claim rejection.

The high court heard arguments over whether a company that both administers and funds a benefit plan is operating under a conflict of interest, and if so, how that conflict should factor into the court's review of an administrator's denial of benefits.

The case between Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. and Wanda...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.