Attys React To High Court's Pom v. Coke Lanham Act Ruling

Law360, New York (June 12, 2014, 6:37 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday that federal regulations do not preclude companies from bringing false advertising claims under the Lanham Act, allowing Pom Wonderful LLC to pursue allegations against The Coca-Cola Co. Here, attorneys share their thoughts on the significance of the decision.

William C. Acevedo, Wendel Rosen Black & Dean LLP

"The Supreme Court's ruling in POM v. Coca Cola really boosts a company's ability to cry more than foul when challenging a competitor's marketing claims. The court has drawn a distinction between the FDA's role in policing labeling claims for health reasons and the role of the Lanham...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!