We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

Blocking Coverage From The Anti-Aggregation Rule

Law360, New York (July 14, 2014, 10:10 AM EDT) -- One leading commentator has described the Anti-Aggregation Rule when applied to multiple claims as “in an unsatisfactory state,” evolving “haphazardly and with little reasoning,” serving “no apparent policy,” and turning “on a mystifying conceptual test.” In contrast to these criticisms, the First, Sixth and Seventh Circuits have recently brought clarity to that rule. From these rulings, it is apparent that insurers seeking a declaratory judgment of noncoverage for the settlement of a class action may find difficulty in meeting the amount in controversy requirement for diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332.

While insurers faced with these circumstances may be relegated...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS