Linear Can't Nab Fees In Battery Patent Holder's Suit

By Allissa Wickham (August 27, 2014, 8:42 PM EDT) -- A Texas magistrate judge shot down Linear Technology Corp.'s bid for attorneys' fees in an suit brought by patent-holding company Charge Lion LLC alleging infringement of a battery patent, ruling Linear hadn't shown the patent holder had alleged unreasonable claims or improperly forced defendants into licensing deals.

U.S. Magistrate Judge John D. Love flatly denied the Milpita, California-based circuit manufacturer's motion for attorneys' fees after finding Linear hadn't shown the case was exceptional, as it had failed to support its claim that Charge Lion had acted in bad faith by trying to "extract" settlements from other defendants in the suit....

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!