Irell 'Train Wreck' Exposes Risks Of Deposition Tactics
Law360, New York (August 28, 2014, 7:00 PM EDT) -- A judge's decision declaring a deposition a "train wreck" because an Irell & Manella LLP attorney repeatedly objected that the opposing counsel's questions were too vague can serve as a lesson about the dangers of helping witnesses avoid answering questions, attorneys say.
The attorney's numerous objections during the deposition of an employee of B/E Aerospace Inc., which Irell & Manella is defending in a patent case, disrupted any worthwhile examination and "reflects poorly on the entire judicial process," U.S. Magistrate Judge Frederick Mumm wrote last week.
Judges tend to get frustrated when attorneys engage in deposition tactics that result in the...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!