High Court Split Over EPA's Need To Consider Costs

Law360, New York (March 25, 2015, 6:30 PM EDT) -- U.S. Supreme Court justices appeared split Wednesday over whether the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency had to consider costs before issuing its landmark rule limiting mercury and other toxic emissions from power plants, with the court's liberal wing backing the agency's decision to ignore costs amid skepticism from the conservative wing.

States and industry groups challenging the 2012 Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, or MATS, claim its $9.6 billion annual compliance costs far outweigh the benefits they will produce. The EPA argues that it reasonably construed Section 112 of the Clean Air Act as directing it to consider compliance costs when establishing...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!