Unusual IBM Breach Could Make Coverage Ruling An Outlier

By Jeff Sistrunk (May 18, 2015, 8:51 PM EDT) -- The Connecticut Supreme Court's ruling that an IBM Corp. contractor isn't insured for $6 million in losses stemming from a traffic mishap that exposed IBM employees' personal information gives insurers stronger footing to argue against coverage for data breaches, but the peculiar facts of the case could limit the decision's effects, attorneys say.

In a closely watched case, the Connecticut high court unanimously found Monday that Federal Insurance Co. and Scottsdale Insurance Co. don't have to cover losses stemming from a data breach that occurred when a cart holding computer tapes with IBM employees' sensitive information fell out of the back...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!