1st Circ. Ruling Clarifies Limits Of 'Actual Confusion'

Law360, New York (September 3, 2008, 12:00 AM EDT) -- Likelihood of confusion has long been the lodestar of trademark infringement analysis. Among the evidence considered in such an analysis, so-called "actual confusion" evidence is routinely seen as the best evidence of a likelihood of confusion,[1] such evidence having been deemed "highly probative, if not conclusive, of a likelihood of confusion."[2]

However, in Boston Duck Tours LP v. Super Duck Tours LLC, 531 F.3d 1, 87 U.S.P.Q.2d 1385 (1st Cir. June 18, 2008), the First Circuit articulated important limits regarding evidence of actual confusion in a...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.