Will 3rd Circ. Be Next To Ban ‘Equitable Mootness’?
Law360, New York (August 3, 2015, 12:24 PM EDT) -- Bruce D. Buechler
Cassandra M. Porter The doctrine of equitable mootness permits a bankruptcy court to abstain from hearing an appeal on account of a perceived disruption and/or harm that granting the relief sought in the appeal would cause the debtor. See, e.g., In re UNR Indus., 20 F.3d 766 (7th Cir. 1994). As noted by the Seventh Circuit, there “is a big difference between inability to alter the outcome (real mootness) and unwillingness to alter the outcome ('equitable mootness'). Using one word for two different concepts breeds confusion.” Id. at 769 (emphasis in original). As a result, the Seventh Circuit...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!