Landlord Owed Defense In Bias Row, Ohio High Court Says
Law360, Los Angeles (August 18, 2015, 5:11 PM EDT) -- Auto-Owners Insurance Co. had a duty to defend a landlord in a housing discrimination suit under an umbrella policy, the Ohio Supreme Court affirmed Tuesday, holding that the policy's intentional acts exclusion doesn't apply to bar coverage.
In a 5-2 decision, the state high court said that the so-called inferred intent doctrine doesn't apply to preclude coverage for landlord Steve Granger under the exclusion. Granger sought coverage for a prospective tenant's claim for emotional distress damages stemming from the landlord's alleged discrimination.
"We cannot say that the personal injury was intended in this case, nor can we say that emotional distress...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!