Plaintiffs Regain Edge In Defective Design Cases In Fla.

By Carolina Bolado (November 20, 2015, 10:35 PM EST) -- The Florida Supreme Court's recent decision reinstating a $6.6 million jury verdict in a Union Carbide Corp. asbestos case should make it easier for plaintiffs to bring defective design claims now that the court has clarified that they do not need to propose reasonable alternative designs to prevail.

In a 5-2 ruling issued Oct. 29 in the closely watched Union Carbide v. Aubin, the state's high court rejected the Third District Court of Appeal's application of the "risk utility test" for design defect claims, which adds a burden on plaintiffs to prove a reasonable alternative design.

The decision returned the status...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!