Houston Asks High Court To Consider Cop Retaliation Row
Law360, New York (January 15, 2016, 10:10 PM EST) -- The city of Houston told the U.S. Supreme Court that the Fifth Circuit unfairly extended the high court’s landmark decision in Staub v. Proctor Hospital by favoring a Houston police officer who claimed the department retaliated against him because his father sued the department for racial discrimination.
A team led by former solicitor general Paul D. Clement argued in a Jan. 4 petition for writ of certiorari that the panel unreasonably broadened the cat’s paw theory of liability endorsed in Staub by holding the Houston Police Department liable for trusting biased supervisors during an investigation, leading to Christopher Zamora’s suspension....
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!