We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

Has 'Burlington' Really Changed Retaliation Law?

Law360 (October 29, 2008, 12:00 AM EDT) -- In order to establish a Title VII retaliation claim, an employee has to prove, among other things, that the employer took an “adverse action” against the employee. In Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. White, 126 S.Ct. 2405 (2006), the Supreme Court radically changed the standard regarding what constitutes a “materially adverse action.”

Prior to Burlington, in order to establish that the action was adverse, an employee had to show that there was a “materially adverse change” in the terms and conditions of employment....
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.