Must You Be 'Unreasonable'? Justices To Mull Copyright Fees

By Bill Donahue (April 22, 2016, 7:30 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear arguments Monday on exactly when courts should award attorneys' fees to successful copyright litigants — proceedings that will center on whether the "unreasonableness" of a case should make or break a bid for fees.

The case is the second trip to the high court for petitioner Supap Kirtsaeng — who won a ruling in 2012 that copyright's first-sale doctrine applies even to works sold overseas. The decision meant that textbook giant John Wiley & Sons Inc. couldn't sue him for buying cheap foreign editions and reselling them here.

Victory in hand, Kirtsaeng demanded...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!