Justices Unlikely To Slice Through Insider Trading Knot

By Carmen Germaine (October 7, 2016, 10:20 PM EDT) -- Although the U.S. Supreme Court seemed ready in recent arguments to hold a man liable for insider trading even though his brother-in-law received no financial benefit for passing tips, experts said the justices' apparent unwillingness to stray from their past decisions could leave lower courts and prosecutors still grappling with the Gordian knot of insider trading law.

At oral arguments on Oct. 5, the justices seemed to place little credence in Illinois trader Bassam Salman's claim that he shouldn't have been convicted for insider trading because his brother-in-law Maher Kara received no financial or pecuniary benefit for passing tips to his...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!