Analysis

Law360's Pay-For-Delay Cheat Sheet For 2017

Law360, New York (January 17, 2017, 5:42 PM EST) -- After more than three years of litigation in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark pay-for-delay ruling, 2016 saw a slew of appellate opinions over the scope of the antitrust scrutiny patent settlements can face. But the year ahead promises still more key decisions from the Third Circuit and a host of district court action as a slew of other cases move forward.

Here's a cheat sheet of major pay-for-delay suits to watch in 2017:

First Circuit

Case: In re: Loestrin 24 Fe Antitrust Litigation

Court: District of Rhode Island

Drug: Loestrin, oral contraceptive

Status: Awaiting motion to dismiss ruling...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!