Wash. High Court Rebuffs Florist's Same-Sex Objections

Law360, New York (February 16, 2017, 5:50 PM EST) -- A Washington florist who refused to serve a same-sex wedding, citing religious objections, violated state anti-discrimination laws and is not protected by the First Amendment, the Washington Supreme Court unanimously ruled Thursday.

The high court’s 59-page ruling is strongly in favor of the arguments of the state and American Civil Liberties Union, which was defending the couple in question, Robert Ingersoll and Curt Freed, shooting down a variety of statutory and constitutional claims by Arlene's Flowers Inc. owner Barronelle Stutzman. The florist, backed by the Alliance Defending Freedom, has already announced her intent to take the case to the U.S. Supreme...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!