9th Circ. Revives Pesticide Co.'s Bid For TM Suit Coverage

By Jeff Sistrunk (August 1, 2017, 8:42 PM EDT) -- The Ninth Circuit on Tuesday held that a trio of insurance companies must cover a pesticide company's costs to defend a lawsuit over its alleged use of a business partner's trademark, while directing a lower court to hold a trial on whether the insurers must cover the company's settlement of the underlying litigation.

In a brief memorandum opinion, a panel of the appellate court reversed an Oregon federal judge's rulings that Willowood USA LLC's insurers — Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Co., Colony Insurance Co. and Allied World Assurance Co. — had no duty to defend the company in the trademark...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!