It's Time To Fix FIFRA Preemption

By Lawrence Ebner (August 17, 2017, 2:22 PM EDT) -- In 1991 the U.S. Supreme Court held in Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. Mortier, 501 U.S. 597, that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), the nation's primary pesticide law, does not preempt states' political subdivisions (i.e., local governments) from banning or restricting the sale or use of pesticides that have been approved both by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and state regulatory agencies. Recognizing that two layers of pesticide regulation are enough, most states reacted to Mortier by enacting statutes or promulgating regulations that at least partially preempt local government regulation. But many of those state-imposed preemption measures are riddled with exceptions and loopholes, and all are subject to shifting political winds....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!