Weakening The CDA Would Have Unintended Consequences

By Charles Harris II (August 18, 2017, 3:04 PM EDT) -- The majority view among courts is that section 230 of the Federal Communications Decency Act (the "CDA")[1] broadly immunizes websites from liability for user content. Legislators in both the U.S. House and Senate recently introduced bipartisan bills that would amend the CDA and federal criminal code to expressly carve out websites that facilitate sex trafficking from section 230's immunity. While this legislative effort is no doubt commendable, the vague amendatory language in the proposed legislation could open the door for the plaintiffs bar to file vexatious lawsuits against even law-abiding websites, and lead to uneven enforcement of sex trafficking crimes by state authorities. Websites that allow users to post content should be aware of this proposed legislation as it works its way through Congress....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!