No Need For Justices To Review Arbitration Case, Patient Says

By Emma Cueto (September 5, 2017, 5:06 PM EDT) -- A former patient at a Florida women's health provider told the U.S. Supreme Court there's no reason for the high court to hear the provider's appeal, saying the Florida Supreme Court was right to determine the patient was not bound by an arbitration clause based on state law and that the provider never brought up the Federal Arbitration Act until after the decision.

Women's Care Florida LLC and Dr. Eileen Hernandez, who were accused by Lualhati Crespo and her husband of medical malpractice over the stillborn birth of the couple's child, were wrong to claim that the case had any relevance...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Attached Documents

Related Sections

Law Firms

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!