Insider Trading After Martoma: Benefits Without Friends?

Law360, New York (September 18, 2017, 1:33 PM EDT) -- In United States v. Martoma,[1] the Second Circuit appeared to upend insider trading law by holding that criminal insider trading liability may arise from a tipper’s “gift” of material, nonpublic information (“MNPI”) to a tippee that the tipper “expects will trade on the information,” whether or not there was a close personal relationship between the tipper and tippee.[2] The decision potentially expands the category of persons that, upon the disclosure of confidential information without pecuniary or tangible benefit, may constitute tippers or tippees subject to insider trading liability in the Second Circuit. Indeed, the court made clear that liability for “gifted”...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!