Extending CalPERS V. ANZ Securities To Exchange Act Cases

By Alan Glickman, William Gussman Jr. and Abigail Coster (September 21, 2017, 3:34 PM EDT) -- In a landmark ruling issued in June, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the filing of a class action for violations of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") does not toll the three-year statute of repose set forth in Section 13 of the Securities Act with respect to identical, individual "opt-out" claims of the putative class members. Specifically, in California Public Employees' Retirement System v. ANZ Securities Inc., 137 S. Ct. 2042 (2017), the U.S. Supreme Court explained that because Section 13's three-year period is a statute of repose that imposes an absolute limit on future liability, opt-out plaintiffs cannot rely on American Pipe tolling[1] to save claims filed after its expiration....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!