NJ Ruling Does Not Bode Well For 'Stranger' Life Policies

Law360 (September 6, 2019, 3:47 PM EDT) -- On June 4, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued a decision in Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. Wells Fargo Bank NA — closely watched by the life insurance and life settlement industries — ruling that stranger-originated life insurance transactions are void ab initio human life wagers. The unanimous court ruled that STOLI transactions run afoul of New Jersey’s insurable interest statute — and violate New Jersey’s Constitution, anti-gambling statutes and public policy against wagering.[1]

The court distinguished illegal STOLI from legal life settlements, where an insured (or someone with an insurable interest in the insured’s life) purchases a policy...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS