Law360, New York ( April 4, 2014, 6:02 PM EDT) -- Application of the California Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions Inc. (2011) has resulted in inconsistent verdicts, depending primarily on whether a plaintiff is insured. In Howell, the court held that a plaintiff is entitled to recover damages for medical expenses that were actually paid — not what was billed by a medical provider. While this ruling appears straightforward its application has proven problematic....
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.
A Law360 subscription includes features such as
- Daily newsletters
- Expert analysis
- Mobile app
- Advanced search
- Judge information
- Real-time alerts
- 450K+ searchable archived articles
And more!
Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.