Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
November 16, 2004
Arminak and Associates Inc v. Saint-Gobain Calmar Inc
Case Number:
8:04-cv-01455
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Blecher Collins
- Covington & Burling
- Crowell & Moring
- Finnegan
- Foley & Lardner
- Greenberg Traurig
- Haynes & Boone
- Kelley Drye
- Kesselman Brantly
- K&L Gates
- Lewis Brisbois
- Manatt Phelps
- McGuireWoods
- Reed Smith
- Snell & Wilmer
- Stubbs Alderton
- Troutman Pepper
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
September 14, 2011
9th Circ. Rejects Arminak Appeal In Antitrust Suit
The Ninth Circuit on Wednesday declined to hear Arminak & Associate Inc.'s appeal of a lower court decision limiting evidence in a long-running antitrust suit against MeadWestvaco Calmar Inc. for an alleged plot to monopolize the trigger sprayers market.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login