Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Paul v. Intel Corporation - Consolidated Action
Case Number:
1:05-cv-00485
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Biggs & Battaglia
- Bingham McCutchen
- BoiesBattin
- Burch Porter
- Chimicles Schwartz
- Cooch & Taylor
- Cotchett Pitre
- Drummond & Associates
- Duane Morris
- Fine Kaplan
- Finger & Slanina
- Finkelstein Thompson
- Glassman Wyatt
- Gordon Law Offices
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Hagens Berman
- Halloran Farkas
- Hausfeld LLP
- Heyman Enerio
- Keller Grover
- Laughlin Nunnally
- Law Offices of Francis O. Scarpulla
- Lieff Cabraser
- Macauley LLC
- Mattson Ricketts
- Noonan Lance
- Potter Anderson
- Prickett Jones
- Richards Layton
- Saveri & Saveri
- Schmittinger & Rodriguez
- Trump Alioto
Companies
- Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
- Apple Inc.
- Avnet Inc.
- Computer & Communications Industry Association
- Dow Jones & Co.
- Ingram Micro Inc.
- Intel Corp.
- United Food & Commercial Workers International Union
- Washington Post Co.
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 01, 2014
Consumers Lose Class Cert. Bid In Intel Antitrust MDL
A Delaware federal judge refused Thursday to grant class certification to a group of consumers pursuing a nearly decade-old antitrust suit accusing Intel Corp. of squeezing out a rival microprocessor manufacturer.
-
April 03, 2013
Intel Leans On Comcast To Fight Class In AMD Antitrust Case
Intel Corp. argued Friday that the U.S. Supreme Court's recent Comcast Corp. decision supported its contention that consumers suing the chipmaker for allegedly squeezing out a rival microprocessor manufacturer didn't have strong enough evidence to win class certification.